National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB)
About
The NSABB is a federal advisory committee that addresses issues related to biosecurity and dual use research at the request of the United States Government. The NSABB has up to 25 voting members with a broad range of expertise including molecular biology, microbiology, infectious diseases, biosafety, public health, veterinary medicine, plant health, national security, biodefense, law enforcement, scientific publishing, and other related fields.
For additional information about the NSABB, please email [email protected].
Charter
NATIONAL SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD FOR BIOSECURITY
AUTHORITY
Required by 42 U.S.C. 283r, section 404O of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, as amended and the Pandemic and All-Hazards and Preparedness Act, Pub. L. No. 109-417, section 205, 120 Stat. 2851 (2006) (PAHPA), codified at 42 U.S.C. 262a note. The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB or Committee) is governed by the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1014).
OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF ACTIVITIES
The NSABB will provide technical advice, guidance, or recommendations to relevant Federal departments and agencies related to biosafety and biosecurity oversight of biomedical research.
DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES
The NSABB shall provide technical advice, guidance, or recommendations, to relevant Federal departments and agencies related to biosafety and biosecurity oversight of biomedical research, including — (1) oversight of federally-conducted or federally-supported dual use biomedical research, such as the review of policies or frameworks used to assess and appropriately manage safety and security risks associated with such research, taking into consideration national security concerns, the potential benefits of such research, considerations related to the research community, transparency, and public availability of information, and international research collaboration; and (2) pursuant to section 205 of the PAHPA, when requested by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) (a) a core curriculum and training requirements for workers in maximum containment biological laboratories; and (b) periodic evaluations of maximum containment biological laboratory capacity nationwide and assessments of the future need for increased laboratory capacity. The NSABB will also address other issues related to biosafety and biosecurity oversight of biomedical research as directed by the Secretary.
In carrying out the duties above, the NSABB may consider strategies to improve the safety and security of biomedical research, including through — (1) leveraging or using new technologies and scientific advancements to reduce safety and security risks associated with such research and improve containment of pathogens; and (2) outreach to, and education and training of, researchers, laboratory personnel, and other appropriate individuals with respect to safety and security risks associated with such research and mitigation of such risks.
AGENCY OR OFFICIAL TO WHOM THE COMMITTEE REPORTS
The NSABB will advise the Secretary and the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), along with relevant Federal department and agencies, consistent with the duties as set forth in the above section.
SUPPORT
Management and support services for the NSABB will be provided by the Office of Science Policy (OSP), within the Office of the Director, NIH.
ESTIMATED ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS AND STAFF YEARS
The estimated annual cost for operating the Committee, including compensation and travel expenses for members, but excluding staff support, is $147,127. The estimated annual person-years of staff support required is 0.2, at an estimated cost of $43,539.
DESIGNATED FEDERAL OFFICER
The Director, NIH, will assign a full-time or permanent part-time NIH employee to serve as the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) of the NSABB. In the event that the DFO cannot fulfill the assigned duties of the NSABB, one or more full-time or permanent part-time NIH employees will be assigned as DFO and carryout these duties on a temporary basis.
The DFO will approve or call all NSABB and subcommittee/working group meetings, prepare and approve all meeting agendas, attend all NSABB and subcommittee/working group meetings, adjourn any meetings when it is determined to be in the public interest, and chair meetings when directed to do so by the official to whom the committee reports.
ESTIMATED NUMBER AND FREQUENCY OF MEETINGS
Meetings of the Committee will be held approximately three times within a fiscal year to be convened on an as-needed basis, at the call of the DFO. Meetings will be open to the public except as determined by the Secretary at the request of the DFO in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) and 41 C.F.R. 102-3.155 including specifying the specific exception(s) that justifies closure. Notice of all meetings will be given to the public. In the event a portion of a meeting is closed to the public, as determined by the Secretary in accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, an annual report of closed or partially-closed meetings will be prepared which will contain, at a minimum, a list of members and their business addresses, the Committee’s functions, dates and places of meetings, and a summary of the Committee’s activities and recommendations made during the fiscal year.
DURATION
Continuing.
TERMINATION
Unless renewed by appropriate action, the charter for the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity will terminate two years from the date the charter is filed.
MEMBERSHIP AND DESIGNATION
The NSABB shall be composed of not more than 25 voting members, including the Chair, appointed by the Secretary, with expertise in biology, infectious diseases, public health, ethics, national security, and other fields, as the Secretary determines appropriate.
Other fields of expertise may also include but are not limited to:
- Molecular Biology/Genomics
- Microbiology (Bacteriology)
- Microbiology (Virology)
- Clinical Infectious Diseases/Diagnostics
- Institutional and/or Laboratory Biosafety and Biosecurity
- Epidemiology
- Health Physicist/Radiation Safety
- Pharmaceutical Production
- Veterinary Medicine
- Plant Health
- Food Production
- Military Biodefense Programs and Military Medicine
- Intelligence
- Biodefense
- Law
- Law Enforcement
- Academia
- Scientific Publishing
- Export Controls
- Industry Perspective
- Public Perspective
Voting members must be eligible to serve as Special Government Employees, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 202, and will serve as such in their individual capacities as subject matter experts. The Secretary will designate the Chair. Appointed members will be invited to serve for overlapping terms of up to four years. An appointed member may serve after the expiration of that member’s term until a successor has been appointed.
Non-voting ex officio members, including at least one representative of each of the following: (i) The Department of Health and Human Services; (ii) The Department of Defense; (iii) The Department of Agriculture; (iv) The Department of Homeland Security; (v) The Department of Energy; (vi) The Department of State; (vii) The Office of Science and Technology Policy; and (viii) The Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
Representatives of such other Federal departments or agencies as the Secretary determines appropriate to carry out NSABB’s duties.
A quorum for the NSABB will consist of a majority of the appointed members eligible to vote. The non-voting ex officio members will not be counted in calculating a quorum. Of the voting members, any who are recused from participating in an action on a particular issue, (e.g., due to a conflict of interest), will not be counted in calculating the quorum. All votes relating to any review of a recommendation by the NSABB will be open to the public unless the meeting has been closed to the public in accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
SUBCOMMITTEES
As necessary, subcommittees and working groups may be established by the DFO to perform functions within the Committee’s jurisdiction. The advice/recommendations of the subcommittee/working group must be deliberated by the parent advisory committee. A subcommittee/working group may not report directly to a Federal official unless there is statutory authority to do so.
Subcommittee membership may be drawn in whole or in part from the parent advisory committee. The nonvoting ex officio subcommittee members will not be counted in calculating a quorum. All subcommittee members may vote on subcommittee actions and all subcommittee members count towards the quorum for a subcommittee meeting. Ad hoc consultants are not members, do not count towards the quorum, and may not vote. A quorum for a subcommittee will be three members. The Department Committee Management Officer will be notified upon establishment of each standing subcommittee and will be provided information on its name, membership, function, and estimated frequency of meetings.
RECORDKEEPING
Meetings of the Committee and its subcommittees will be conducted according to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, other applicable laws, and Departmental policies. Committee and subcommittee records will be handled in accordance with General Records Schedule 6.2, Federal Advisory Committee Records, or other approved agency records disposition schedule. These records will be available for public inspection and copying, subject to any applicable exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and 41 C.F.R. 102-3.170.
FILING DATE
April 7, 2024
APPROVED
By Xavier Becerra, Secretary, HHS.
Signed on April 4, 2024
Roster of Voting Members
Chair
LEVINSON, Rachel, MA
Executive Director, National Research Initiatives
Knowledge Enterprise
Arizona State University
Washington, DC 20006
Members
BENJAMIN, Shannon, MS, MBA
Associate Director, Environmental Health & Safety
Ginkgo Bioworks
Boston, MA 02210
BERNARD, Kenneth, MD
RADM, U.S. Public Health Service (Retired)
Former Special Assistant to the President for Biodefense, Homeland Security Council, White House
Former Special Adviser for Health and Security, National Security Council
Pebble Beach, CA 93953
FLETCHER, Jacqueline, PhD
Regents Professor Emerita
National Institute for Microbial Forensics and Food and Agricultural Biosecurity
Oklahoma State University
Corrales, NM 87048
HAYNES, Karmella, PhD
Associate Professor
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering
Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University
Atlanta, GA 30322
LONDON, Alex John, PhD
K&L Gates Professor of Ethics and Computational Technologies
Department of Philosophy
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
MADAD, Syra Madad, DHSc, MSc, MCP
Faculty, Boston University’s Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases Policy & Research
Fellow, Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Senior Director, System-wide Special Pathogens Program, NYC Health + Hospitals
New York, NY 10013
METZGER, Dennis, PhD
Distinguished Professor Emeritus
Department of Immunology and Microbial Disease
Albany Medical College
Albany, NY 12208
Roster of Ex Officio Members
BEAVER, William
Biodefense Policy Advisor
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
Department of Defense
BRINSFIELD, Kathy, MD, MPH
Director/National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center
Office of the Director of National Intelligence
GRABER, Joseph, PhD
Senior Technical Advisor
Department of Energy
HOWERTON, Samuel, PhD
Chief Scientist of DHS Science and Technology Directorate
Department of Homeland Security
KOZLOVAC, Joseph, MS
Biological Safety Specialist
Agricultural Research Service
United States Department of Agriculture
KUHNERT-TALLMAN, Wendi, PhD
Senior Advisor for Laboratory Science
Office of the Deputy Director for Infectious Disease
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
LIMAGE, Julia, PhD
Director, Office of Strategy, Policy, and Requirements
Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response
MARRAZZO, Jeanne, MD, MPH, FACP, FIDSA
Director, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
National Institutes of Health
PILLAI, Segaran, PhD
Director, Office of Laboratory Safety
Office of the Commissioner
Food and Drug Administration
WEAND, Kirsten, PhD
Acting Director, Office of Biological Policy Staff
Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation
Department of State
WELBY, Stephen
Deputy Director for National Security
Office of Science and Technology Policy
Meetings
Name | Date | Event Link |
---|---|---|
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 11/21/2024 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 01/27/2023 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 09/21/2022 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 02/28/2022 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 01/23/2020 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 05/11/2017 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 11/04/2016 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 05/24/2016 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 01/07/2016 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 09/28/2015 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 05/05/2015 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 11/25/2014 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 10/22/2014 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 11/27/2012 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 12/15/2011 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 06/23/2011 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 10/19/2010 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 12/03/2009 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 05/27/2009 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 04/29/2009 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 12/10/2008 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 02/27/2008 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 04/19/2007 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 10/25/2006 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 07/13/2006 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 03/30/2006 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 11/21/2005 | View Event |
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting | 06/30/2005 | View Event |
Reports and Recommendations
- Proposed Biosecurity Oversight Framework for the Future of Science
Published Date: March 2023 - Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel to Review the 2014 Smallpox (Variola) Virus Incident on the NIH Campus
Published Date: May 2017
Working Group to Review and Evaluate Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) Policy
Charge:
The NSABB will evaluate and provide recommendations to the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on the effectiveness of the current oversight framework for research involving enhanced potential pandemic pathogens (ePPPs). In developing these recommendations, the NSABB should consider the OSTP Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanism for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight and the process adopted by HHS for the review and oversight of proposed research involving enhanced potential pandemic pathogens. Review should include:
A. Policy scope, in terms of preserving benefits of ePPP research while minimizing potential biosafety and biosecurity risks, including whether wild type pathogens, animal models of transmissibility, etc., should be considered;
B. Considerations for supporting ePPP research internationally, per OSTP framework encouraging harmonized policy guidance; and
C. Balancing considerations regarding security and public transparency when sharing information about research involving ePPPs.
The review should consider the impact that the Policy Guidance has had on work involving the creation, transfer, or use of enhanced potential pandemic pathogens, research programs, and institutions when developing these recommendations.
Working Group to Review and Evaluate Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) Policies
Charge:
The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and the National Security Council (NSC) formally request the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) evaluate, analyze, and provide specific recommendations on the following tasks and subtasks:
A. The U.S. Government DURC Policies, the United States Government Policy for Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern and the United States Government Policy for Institutional Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern, were released in 2012 and 2014 respectively, and require thorough review to inform future policy and governance deliberations. The NSABB should:
- Evaluate the effectiveness of the DURC Policies in achieving the issuances’ intent; evaluate the impact on research institutions and the U.S. Government’s ability to support research; and identify any challenges with implementation;
- Reevaluate the DURC definition, considering advances in life sciences research and convergence with other scientific disciplines and sectors;
- Evaluate the effectiveness of the DURC pathogen list and experimentation type construct to determine if the approach sufficiently addresses future potential threats, including across the spectrum of life sciences, is conducive to research risk-mitigation, and whether alternative approaches are warranted for consideration by the USG; and
- Evaluate the effectiveness of the DURC policies with regard to publication, public communication, and dissemination of dual-use research methodologies and results.
B. With the understanding that U.S. Government DURC Policies will undergo review in Phase 2A., and in accordance with Section 8 of the January 2017 Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanisms for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO), the NSABB should:
- Evaluate Section 8 of the Policy Guidance for P3CO, Future Commitments of the P3CO Policy Guidance, and provide recommendations on possible P3CO Policy Guidance incorporation into policy frameworks associated with any recommended revisions of the DURC Policies.
Throughout Phase 2, the NSABB should consider the need for flexible and adaptive governance approaches that 1) keep pace with scientific advances and the evolving understanding of risks and benefits; 2) can coalesce and integrate existing governance guidance or policy, 3) can be applied to mitigate risk not only from research of concern but other biosecurity and biosafety considerations.
Additional Activities
Stakeholder Engagement Workshop on Implementation of the U.S. Government Policy for Institutional Oversight of Life Sciences DURC
On September 25-26, 2017, the U.S. Government hosted a public workshop to engage with stakeholders and facilitate information sharing among research institutions regarding their approaches to, and experiences with, implementing the United States Government Policy for Institutional Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC). The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity helped to develop the agenda and plan the workshop. More information and archived video recordings can be found HERE.
Potential Pandemic pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) Policy Development
On October 16, 2014, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy announced the launch of the U.S. Government (USG) gain-of-function (GOF) deliberative process to re-evaluate the potential risks and benefits associated with GOF studies with potential pandemic pathogens. The NSABB served as the official federal advisory body on the GOF issue and was tasked with providing recommendations to the USG on a conceptual approach for evaluating proposed GOF research. More information about this topic can be found HERE.