Biosafety and Biosecurity Policy
Life sciences research is essential to protecting global health security by helping us to understand the fundamental nature of human-pathogen interactions and informing public health and preparedness efforts, such as the development of vaccines and medical countermeasures. OSP develops policies to preserve the benefits of this research while minimizing its potential misuse.
Dual Use Research of Concern
Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) is life sciences research that, based on current understanding, can be reasonably anticipated to provide knowledge, information, products, or technologies that could be directly misapplied to pose a significant threat with broad potential consequences to public health and safety, agricultural crops and other plants, animals, the environment, materiel, or national security. The United States Government’s oversight of DURC is aimed at preserving the benefits of life sciences research while minimizing the risk of misuse of the knowledge, information, products, or technologies provided by such research.
Watch the video “Dual Use Research: A Dialogue”
External Resources
Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens (ePPP)
The U.S. Government and the Department of Health and Human Services define enhanced potential pandemic pathogen (ePPP) research as research that may be reasonably anticipated to create, transfer or use potential pandemic pathogens resulting from the enhancement of a pathogen’s transmissibility and/or virulence in humans.
ePPP research can help us prepare for the next pandemic, for example by informing public health and preparedness efforts including surveillance and the development of vaccines and medical countermeasures. However, such research requires strict oversight and may only be conducted with appropriate biosafety and biosecurity measures.
The HHS Framework for Guiding Funding Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens (HHS P3CO Framework) was established in 2017 to guide HHS funding decisions on proposed ePPP research and aims to preserve the benefits of life sciences research involving ePPPs while minimizing potential biosafety and biosecurity risks. The HHS P3CO Framework is responsive to and in accordance with the Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanisms for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight issued by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy following a three-year, public deliberative process.
Department of Health and Human Services P3CO Framework
U.S. Government Policy on Enhanced PPP Research
Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) Policy Development
Symposia Summaries and Commissioned Reports
Risk and Benefit Analysis of Gain of Function Research – Final Report (Gryphon Scientific)
Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis (Professor Michael J. Selgelid)
Additional Material
NIH Director’s Statement on Funding Pause on Certain Types of Gain-of-Function Research
NIH Director’s Statement on Lifting of NIH Funding Pause on Gain-of-Function Research
Supplemental Information on the Risk and Benefit Analysis of Gain-of-Function Research
Gain-of-Function Deliberative Process Written Public Comments (Nov 10, 2014 – June 8, 2016)
External Resources
NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines)
NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines)
Incident Reporting
The NIH Guidelines require that any significant problems, violations, or any significant research-related accidents and illnesses” be reported to OSP within 30 days. Appendix G of the NIH Guidelines specifies certain types of accidents that must be reported on a more expedited basis. Specifically, Appendix G-II-B-2-k requires that spills and accidents in BL2 laboratories resulting in an overt exposure must be immediately reported to the OSP (as well as the IBC). In addition, Appendices G-II-C-2-q and G-II-D-2-k require that spills or accidents occurring in high containment (BL3 or BL4) laboratories resulting in an overt or potential exposure must be immediately reported to OSP (as well as the IBC and BSO).
*Incident reports may be released to the public in full. Please note that incident reports should not include personally identifiable information or any information that you do not wish to make public. Proprietary, classified, confidential, or sensitive information should not be included in the report. If it is necessary to include such information, please clearly mark it as such so that it can be considered for redaction in accordance with Freedom of Information Act exemptions.*
IBC RMS and Registration Information
IBC Self-Assessment Tool
Investigator Brochure
Links to Other Biosafety Resources
Additional Resources
- CDC Biosafety Resources and Tools
- American Biological Safety Association (ABSA)
- AIHA Home Page
- American Society for Microbiology
- The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy
- Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) Website
- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Website
- The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP)
- The Federal Register Website
- The Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare
- The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Website
- Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL)
- Risk Group Classification for Infectious Agents (ABSA)
- Select Agent Program
- Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs
- Biosafety Discussion List